Recent events in my life have caused the need for me to very closely examine the subject of forgiveness. I’m talking more here about forgiveness between two people rather than the forgiveness that comes from God. So here goes …
JUDICIAL FORGIVENESS is a forgiveness that centers around the condition of your heart. It’s when you purpose within yourself to forgive someone else, attempting to give the type of unconditional forgiveness that God grants to all.
RELATIONAL FORGIVENESS is a forgiveness that cannot be offered unless it is asked for. In other words, although judicial forgiveness may have occured, relational forgiveness cannot occur until it is prompted by someone asking for it.
Put another way, you might call judicial forgiveness a general forgiveness, and relational forgiveness a specific forgiveness. The former seems predicated on one’s relationship with God, while the latter seems to be centered on one’s interaction with other human beings.
I think that all too often — and I count myself at the top of the list — people find themselves unable to forgive because they are trying to jump straight into relational forgiveness. They haven’t really addressed the condition of their own heart, and the thoughts or emotions that they have towards one another when there has been conflict or strife. As a result, they find themselves unable to grant the relational forgiveness, although they may in their mind actually desire to (and know that it is redemptive). This is definitely something I struggle with … going through the stage of judicial forgiveness is difficult, because it involves the nature and depth of your relationship with God. On the other hand, relational forgiveness is hard because it involves granting forgiveness to someone who may have hurt you very badly, and whom you might just really not want to talk to or even see ever again.
I am not sure if any of this makes sense, or if I have just had an episode of word vomit. Thoughts, anyone?

Recent Comments